
We recently were assigned to read an article called A Rape In Cyberspace by Julian Dibbell. The discussion we had about it in class was one of the most engaging I have ever been involved in. I have very strong feelings on the subject and it seemed that others did too. Though the views were from two different viewpoints.
The article was about a woman who participated in an early online community called lambdaMOO, where people created online people and would interact with each other. A man made his character overpower the woman's character and raped it online with his commands. Now obviously this guy has some mental issues but that is not the subject of this blog. The discussion that spurned from this article is does that incident count as a real rape? The arguments made in favor of that included that psychologically it may have a very traumatizing affect on a person since she was unable to control her character, she was not in control of the situation which is similar to a real rape. And also that some people are so connected with their identity in these online communities that she may feel as though it really happened, and feel ashamed to walk the halls of that online community again.
Now the part that I cannot accept is the argument that there is no separation from virtual and physical reality. If people cannot make this veery important distinction then that will have a very negative affect on interpersonal relationships in my opinion. Now I do not want to be insensitive to this woman's trauma or anyone else who have had negative experiences online, but I do believe that they just need someone to help them understand the difference between virtual and physical reality. That woman did not get raped! And it is absurd to even compare the virtual rape to a physical one. I would even go as far as saying it is disrespectful to women who have been physically raped to compare it to an online rape. If she understood the difference between virtual reality and physical reality she could have turned her computer off and gone about her day. It would be normal to feel unpleasant afterward but not to be extremely traumatized by the experience. It also happens to be the best solution to the problem. As we discussed in class there is really no way to punish or stop the man for what he did. The only way to deal with it is to take away his power by not giving him power to hurt you.
It may be getting more difficult to see the separation of virtual and physical reality now as the world is getting more and more digital. Much more time is spent online talking to friends, making new friends, finding out the news, even watching and discussing television shows. But even though the gap is closing there will ALWAYS be a separation between virtual life and physical life and it is so important that everyone knows this. The internet is a convenience, not a necessity. People lived without it for thousands of years, and if it somehow crashed forever tomorrow the world would adjust.
What interpersonal communication problems will arise if people cannot separate virtual and physical reality? Well my professor answered that question with a story she told us in class. Apparently two men were sitting next to each other playing a computer game. One man physically stabbed the other, and his reason was he was defending himself because the other man was trying to steal a sword from him on the game. Now when she told this story most everyone had the same reaction, that it was completely ridiculous. And anyone who can separate virtual and physical reality would have the same reaction. But imagine that the majority of the world could not separate the two, what would the consequences of this view be? In that situation the man who stabbed the other man would not have been charged with assault, because he was just defending himself. Isn't that just what this world needs, a bunch of people stabbing each other over a video game?
